On an FDP-related forum I've just been locked out. The Forum leaders said, I would say conspiracy theories. Although that would be interesting but inappropriate.
It was a matter the future of the Bundeswehr and the whole restructuring and in the thread, the participants were called up a new objective of the Bundeswehr to define. The Forum leaders said that the Internet would as one of the biggest threats and the armed forces could indeed find here a new field ...
I mentioned so few points as all the questionable actions after 9 / 11 were after in the forum more or less openly for militant interests regarding economic security, Integration into a new EU army, etc. order was discussed. And I said example, that the attack happened on the war in Iraq lies with 935 (determined by an organization) and by the way this time 1.3 million people as collateral damage on it went ...
Then came the "conspiracy theory" scourge and I said,
It is surprised that there was no discussion regarding "conspiracy theories" are, but only one definition: anything to report the mass media of the West block is not automatically a conspiracy theory! As can be present no matter how much evidence, even international opinion, which may not interest the media because of other Countries still have so much other data, regardless! We, the West Block, we are "our own self-defined truth" about the left arm of this system tells us what we think. Initiative chance! Frightening!
integration problems? Wow! Who is integrated at the top tip for not appear in a multi-polar world? What is required by the little man, you ought to do well in the large, right? Anyone who tries to impose dominant for here, and only "his view of things" through with to strangle anything but silent or dead. So this is integration in the Great?
Then I quoted an article from the literature Well Gazetta of 1986 regarding Glasnost and Perestroika:
As it was still not full openness existed, a limited, for the home, the small circle. In small groups were in their own juice boiled out ideas that were very questionable and sometimes nebulous . Since they could not compete with other views in the debate swollen, they thought of the people with them were fully inflated, it cumbersome, deaf and stubborn. is now all up slowly, there will be speeches, published articles. You can listen to the opposing opinions themselves from the outside look, the right thing, based on its views from wrong, and sometimes seemingly inseparable visionaries.
The is fear of conflict the trait of people who group behavior, routine-like thinking are accustomed who feel unconscious, that any conflict, if it runs normal, logical and democratic and analyzed, finally, their incompetence or even guilt brings to light. Therefore, the reaction : "It was nothing, there was nothing." conflicts were not resolved, they were lulled veiled, smoothed, in demagoguery packed in cotton wool ... The waves got lost. But somewhere there under the surface it seethes, it came to clashes . But until then yes penetrated almost no one. Then began the "outbreaks" - the cases of Uzbekistan, Rostov ... Chernobyl.
We do just as Gorbachev had predicted our glasnost and perestroika West through!
So much so times be criticized for conspiracy theorists. As I said above, there is no objective dialogue takes place, or funny? There is only the definition that all this was the overt and covert rulers, and its open and covert propaganda team (the ruler, rule = the rule, regulation, rule) dictates the reality is the truth and OTHER contrasting images, impressions or opinions automatically conspiracy theories.
interesting, so a definition, is not it? If we do not really something that has to do with democracy, when a ruler and his left arm is the case. But even that is not even up for discussion: S-ON or ON-SCH-democracy? The ruler says we have a democracy!
Those who so use the word conspiracy theorists in the mouth, soft notoriously from any further discussion. Strange, is not it? Why, we should ask it! Why does it with such people never talk to? Why is this People but open to any other shit and cheapest opinion mongering? Wow, Hollywood is a flea jumped across the road, and yesterday at the football game, have you seen the ... It's important that moves the world!
Could it be that these people who say that and not capable of dialogue, have an IQ have the fits under the carpet and so know instinctively know that a dialogue could have disastrous consequences, that is THE TRUTH? Is the truth that is the biggest disaster for those who she bends unceasingly conscious and unconscious and repressed?
Since when have to actually let people dress with a high IQ by people with low IQ or stupid dominate? One should seriously question whether it is next time, if such an objection comes out just open a response to the "appropriate transmission level": "You better are holding their mouths, who is most basic things are not white and not even capable of a dialogue lead times should rather just go back to school! " This language is understood by the intended lot better. For people with such a low IQ you have to watch but that could simply use something impulsive in the "physical dialogue" and you miss a violet.
The contribution of the Russian Writer above it describes exactly the opposite of what the propaganda machine of the Western bloc and its lackeys have us do today: conspiracy theories arise because of too little glasnost (openness) and not by too much glasnost (Internet, dialogue, etc.)
Here is an excerpt of a speech by John F. Kennedy he 27 April 1961 held. The did not mean the Soviet Union!
0 comments:
Post a Comment